|
1
|
- Co-Chairs: K. Topping, & H.Koura
- M. Comerio H.Ikeda
- L.Johnson Y. Murosaki
- K.Ohnishi K.Shigekawa
- K.Tamura
|
|
2
|
- Opportunities for private business to assist employees with life
recovery, home mitigation, and post-event housing; need case studies
focused on facilitating and deterring factors for business
|
|
3
|
- Need better definition of policies for public acquisition of hazardous
lands with varying (known) hazard return frequencies. Better connection
between science and policy is needed regarding justification for
acquisition/relocation.
|
|
4
|
- Need better understanding of the divergence between post-disaster
assistance expectations and reality, and how to reconcile these
differences in our recovery policies. Need to reconcile the differences
between post-disaster response capacities and the latent demand for
housing/services.
|
|
5
|
- How to utilize social responses research such as the Kobe/LA comparative
study for post-disaster loss estimation and planning (challenges loss
modeling physical paradigm).
|
|
6
|
- Linking mitigation to recovery strategy – need more comprehensive
loss/risk assessments (not just structural, but also non-structural,
social, operational, functional, etc.) as well as when to begin
mitigation and how to prioritize.
|
|
7
|
- In addition, need other methods for quantifying the values of
(non-structural) mitigation actions such as continuance of operations,
institutional integrity/reputation, performance-based approach for
operations.
|
|
8
|
- Assess recent disaster recovery financing approaches, including
subsidies, loans and insurance. Recommend systematic policies for future
responses in both countries. Need to evaluate differential impacts of
varying mechanisms on different socio-economic groups.
|